Israel’s emphatic election result embraces the Apartheid state

Separate and not equal

Separate and not equal

Israel’s new Prime Minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, now has a mandate from Israelis to implement his policy: no Palestinian state, and preferential rights for Jewish Israelis.

Let’s be quite clear where that takes you: Apartheid South Africa.

75% of Israel’s population is of Jewish descent; a little over 6 million people. But the overall population of Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories is 14 million.

In a unified state, without any prospect for Palestinian independence, Jewish Israelis are instantly a minority group. Netanyahu has to ensure that Jewish Israelis continue to “rule” and so, just as importantly to his manifesto, is that Jewish Israelis must have more rights to protect them from that majority.

How does he intend to implement this so that he can identify and separate Jewish Israelis from other Israelis?

South Africa under Apartheid presents the template:

Population Registration Act

The first step will be a register of every person in the land to identify them and ensure they are clearly defined. Each person, Jewish Israeli or not, will have to carry a passbook that clearly identifies their population group.

Importantly, since people are now defined, the state cannot permit “mixing” of the definitions, so one of the first sub-rules will be a Mixed Marriages Act that will outlaw such relationships.

Also important, to ensure continued fear between the population groups, will be a Separate Amenities Act. Henceforth, each group will have its own public transport, toilets and other infrastructure.

Land Tenure Act

The whole point of more rights is to use them to benefit yourself. A new Land Tenure Act will ensure that forced expropriation is quite legal and can be used to benefit specific people.

Pass Laws and Influx Control Act

Since there is only one country and it is still necessary to keep the population groups apart, people will have to be physically separated. High walls help but are not absolutely necessary; guns absolutely are.

Job Reservation and Segregation in Education Acts

Once people are clearly identified and separated, the state can ensure preferential access to jobs, as well as gradually reduce the quality of services they provide to those of lesser status.

And then the rest of the Apartheid machine steps swiftly into place. People with lesser rights are usually denied the right to vote. Without a vote, or education or access to decent jobs, it is necessary to prevent rebellion, so the state will need banning orders, the right to detention without trial, and – to give the underclass some form of political motivation – a separate development act that throws them into barren land to fight it out amongst themselves.

I don’t understand the point of this. Self-confident people have no need of such abuse and Israel is a dynamic economy with a technical prowess that is the envy of just about everyone.

Apartheid does more than just the brutality of the oppressed. Such rules are expensive to enforce and turn the state into a massive and corrupt bureaucracy. The business of the state becomes the business of enforcing Apartheid, and given the corruption inherent in such a system, outright theft and embezzlement by people who can never be sanctioned (because they have “special” rights) becomes part of the fabric of government.

In order to ensure enforcement of insane rules the state consumes the economy until the government is part of everything.

South Africa escaped Apartheid at great cost in lives and hope. Worse, even 20 years after the end of Apartheid, the state is still captive to corruption and abuse of state power. The state is too large, its rights too many, and everything dies in its shadow.

Is that really what Israelis just voted for? And for Jews, such as myself, in the diaspora, how do we answer when people ask us: why?

6 replies »

  1. There is no good answer except for withdrawing US financial support. Clearly, there are few US politicians ready to embrace that position yet–Hillary certainly won’t. Nor will whomever the republicans foist on us as their 2016 sacrificial lamb. But the EU might, but of course still is perceived to have some baggage here. How this squares with Bibi’s attempt to lure more European Jews to Israel is something of a mystery to me, frankly. Your righteous indignation is well justified in this case, I’m afraid.

  2. Israel is like the old S. Africa in another way as well. It’s one of the most unlikable states in the world, and the only reason it’s not even more unlikeable is the horrible states that surround it.

    Excellent piece, Gavin, one of your best

  3. Thanks for this update. I wasn’t aware of most of this. This is infuriating. Here we have the Israeli state enacting laws just like those the Nazis aimed at THEM – everyone must be identified and no intermarriage. How does anyone NOT see the irony in this? Argh!

  4. @ceejay68 They haven’t introduced these laws just yet and the US – fortunately – seems as aware of the potential for exactly this scenario should Netanyahu try and impose the “one state” option. Netanyahu is now trying to back away from his promises and we’ll see where that goes as he forms his coalition government.