Come on America. The Mets can do it and so can we.
“Partisan polarization – the vast and growing gap between Republicans and Democrats – is a defining feature of politics today,” the Pew Research Center wrote in the study.
While that observation is hardly a new revelation, there are other elements of the report that document some interesting, and alarming, facts about the nature of democracy in America in 2014.
For example, we already know that individuals who lean heavily to the left or to the right dominate political discourse on the airwaves and the Internet. But the study also very clearly shows how those on the far ends of the political spectrum wield a disproportionately large influence on politics, government and democracy.
According to the study, hardline conservatives and liberals account for just over a third (36 percent) of the U.S. public, but have a greater role than the majority (64 percent) of Americans. They register to vote — and do vote — at greater rates than the rest of the nation. They donate to, volunteer for, and work on political campaigns in higher numbers. They also are more likely to be in personal contact with candidates and elected officials — and they are more comfortable discussing politics with others.
No one ever said democracy is perfect, but the system is not supposed to be one in which power is so heavily concentrated among a minority of citizens.
So how do we fix things?
Trying to answer this question sets off another alarm bell because it’s difficult to imagine a scenario in which a majority of Americans would become more engaged in all facets of the democratic process.
We could increase the teaching of civics, but that won’t guarantee that today’s students will be more active in government and politics as adults.
Another approach would be to make people more aware of how government and politics directly affect their lives. It’s easy to see that connection when lawmakers are voting on a bill to raise the minimum wage, but much more difficult to identify with the vast majority of legislation that passes through local, state and federal government.
In theory, this is a role the news media could fill. But news organizations (with a few exceptions) are businesses that need to be profitable. It’s all about attracting readers and viewers. A story explaining the significance of a complex piece of legislation isn’t going to draw the same audience as a feature on the latest escapades of the Kardashians.
Of course, all of us as citizens have the opportunity to become informed, educated voters and take more active roles in the democratic process. Thanks to the Internet, we now have more information than ever at our fingertips. But the Internet, just like cable television, has given us more choices. If we don’t find politics interesting, there are plenty of other options ranging from sitcoms and reality shows to sports and movies and more to keep us entertained.
Lastly, those who do wield influence, that 36 percent on the far left and far right, have little incentive to get more folks involved in politics and government. Why relinquish power to others?
All told, it’s not a pretty picture, but I believe it’s a realistic one.
However, I also believe there will be positive change; I just can’t say when or how. I’m an optimist by nature. I root religiously for the New York Mets, and if I can believe the Amazins will one day regain respectability in the sports world, I also can be confident that our democracy, despite its flaws, will continue to change and adapt with the times – and maybe even grow stronger in the years ahead.