American Culture

Gay marriage: Fred Phelps’ death is the end of an era, but it isn’t the end of the fight

The passing of Fred Phelps actually makes the struggle for gay marriage and LGBT equality a little more difficult.

A few days ago I summed up the impact the late Fred Phelps exerted on American society, concluding that he was, ironically, one of the best things that ever happened to the LGBT community’s quest for social justice. A number of other observers agreed, including Jay Michaelson at The Daily Beast and Peter Scheer at TruthDig, who thanked him for “his years of service to the gay rights movement.”

Now that we’ve had a few days to let all that has been written and said sink in, I find myself thinking less about Phelps and more about his fellow travelers who remain. No, I’m not thinking of his family and whatever is left of the “Westboro Baptist Church.” I’m thinking of his more socially acceptable colleagues in ongoing battle against equality. America’s best Christian, Mrs. Betty Bowers, summed it up thusly:

Fred Phelps (1929 — 2014) was just an unpolished version of most “respectable” anti-gay “Christian” organizations, such as Focus on the Family, Heritage Foundation, Traditional Values Coalition, Family Research Council, Concerned Women for America, et al. The only difference? They have expensive focus-groups that tell them to speak in code — and use hair conditioner.

Exactly. In my post earlier in the week I named a couple of names – Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh – and Frank Dilatush, one of S&R’s alpha commenters, kicked off an interesting discussion over the politicization of the issue. He argued that “[h]ate doesn’t have any particular political affiliation. It’s a voice of unreason unto itself.” I agreed, in principle anyway. However, I argued, fairness and equal rights are political issues, whether they ought to be or not, and explained that there isn’t much in life that isn’t, in some respect, political. I encourage you to read that exchange. It’s not long, but it is thought-provoking, and is a good example of why we value the contributions of smart readers like Frank.

Landover Baptist Church‘s Bowers, who has been one of the best things on the Internet for years, does a lovely job yanking the hoods off those who are identical to Phelps in every respect save tone and wardrobe. As I noted in that comment thread, Coulter is Phelps in an expensive dress. Limbaugh, Focus on the Family, Rick Santorum, the Republican National Committee, and a disturbing percentage of those seeking public office under the GOP banner, to name only a few, believe what the Westboro crowd believes, and if they’re smart enough to dress it up with lipstick and a strand of pearls, make no mistake, their platform is the same pig underneath.

In truth, the respectable wing of the hate movement is probably happier that Fred is dead than are the people he persecuted. With him alive, they had to be extra careful how they framed their concerns for the sanctity of marriage because they really couldn’t afford any side by side comparisons. Now that he’s gone, though, they can more freely sally forth under the cloak of “moderation,” and this makes them even more dangerous.

Whatever the movement, the ultimate value of the radical is that he/she provides cover for the moderates. The zeal of the Black Panthers and Malcolm X, for instance, undoubtedly benefited Martin Luther King. Nervous white folk might not have liked King’s horde of peaceful marchers, but they were less terrifying (and hence more acceptable) than Black Power types preaching ominous ideologies like “by any means necessary.”

It’s true for social justice movements and it’s also true for reactionary movements. As such, those of us who care about fairness for gays need to be doubly vigilant now that Fred is gone. We have mid-term elections coming up and as the president noted the other day, for some reason the Democrats always get their asses handed to them in these things. While Dems getting their balls stomped doesn’t bother me, per se, we should all be concerned by who is doing the kicking.

Phelps made a career talking an especially virulent talk. But he had no real – ie policy making – power. His ideological brethren, on the other hand – Congressional reps, senators, governors, lobbyists, “think tank” “intellectuals,” – and the modern day robber barons who own and fund them (the Koch brothers, Art Pope), they have a great deal of power. They have the power to walk the walk. Phelps could say things that outraged us. He is survived by better dressed colleagues who can rig the game against not just gays, but against everyone who dreams of a fair, just America. We should all be deeply grateful for the current intramural warfare on the right between the social conservative, Tea Party and “business” factions – when there really isn’t a party that represents your best interests, an enemy in disarray is the best you can hope for.

In the end, I’m a lot less worried about words than I am actions. Fred Phelps was a symbol and his passing feels, emotionally, like a watershed moment. Ding dong, the witch is dead – it feels like victory.

But this isn’t true. At all. If anything, the battle for social justice just got a little harder.

2 replies »

  1. in reality it all boils down to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. freedom!! a person has the right to live their life as they see fit not as someone else sees fit. if you are not hurting anyone, and treat people with respect, the way you would like to be treated all is good. we have no business telling people what we think is the right way to live. we have lost all contact with what the constitution really meant. it was not even practiced correctly when it was written. when you hear the war on…, they have just taken some more rights away from you. no knock search warrants, listening to our conversations, reading our emails. ehn are we going to say enough is enough?? if you want to do heroin that is your business unless you are hurting someone else. we have became a police state in the name of government protection. the police have no responsibility to protect you according to the justice department. there is only one person responsible for that and that is you. that is why there is a second amendment. that is written to recognize the fact you have the right to protect your self from those who believe things that you do not and are in the majority. it is your right to believe what you want and live your life the way you see fit without interference. when you start to hurt other people then the government should step in and use the justice department to handle things. guns give minorities and the weak, like women, an equalizer to protect their happiness and freedoms. the minorities should be the ones that try to protect that option and i see a lot of them trying to get rid of guns. it does not make sense to me. if you do not like guns do not own them, but do not try to to my right a way. having the right to be your self is what makes a great country, not trying to cookie mold everyone into what some religion thinks is the right way to live. and of course if you do not live that way they will punish you for not believing the same the same way. the 10% of the population that owns 90% of the worlds money are probably the ones trying to get rid of the guns because they are afraid of the masses. and even if they get rid of the guns they will still have all the protection they need. freedom and the right to protect that freedom. to keep the criminal types at bay. when guns are illegal only criminals will have them. at that point unfortunately i will have to become a criminal because i will not give mine up. we all know prohibition has never worked on anything. of course that will not stop a government. look at qe infinity that never works it only post pones the inevitable and then makes it worse. watch and see the bubbles will pop just latter. it has happened the same way though out history, but the blame will be put on someone else that is politics. no body wants it on their record no matter how much harm they do to the people. sit back and enjoy the ride.

  2. To your point, I seem to remember Stokely Carmichael (or Huey or H. Rap) saying, “They only talk to Dr. King because otherwise they’d have to talk to me.”

Leave us a reply. All replies are moderated according to our Comment Policy (see "About S&R")

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s