Business/Finance

Pointing out the glaringly obvious to the USDA

by James Boyce

You’d think the USDA would see the flaw of logic in letting the people who make the food inspect the food and decide if it is actually safe to eat.

The USDA has decided in its infinite wisdom, despite pink slime and a few other debacles of the food industry, to test a program allowing chicken companies to check their own livestock and decide whether or not the chickens are safe to eat.

The USDA claims this will save them tens of millions of dollars.

Well, USDA, I can save you even more. If you’re going to let the chicken companies inspect their own chickens, just trash the whole program, because I guarantee you they will decide “ALL of our chickens are safe!”

At some point, you would hope someone at the USDA (and I looked it up, there are over 100,000 employees there) would have raised their hand and pointed out the glaringly obvious: “Uh, since these guys are selling us chicken/beef/fish/whatever, don’t you think they are going to say that everything they’re selling is safe?”

Ideally, another person (we’re up to 2 out of 100,000 – a push perhaps, but I woke up optimistic this morning) would have seconded the first person’s statement and then, just maybe, we could have our food actually inspected before we eat it.

Which, I will point out to the USDA and its 100,000 employees, is generally considered to be their core job.

And it gets worse.

Right now, the USDA inspectors (who are independent, don’t work for the chicken companies, and aren’t driven by chicken company profits for holiday bonuses) inspect 35 chickens a minute for lovely things like bile, feces and random spare parts that got through processing.

That’s a chicken every two seconds.

Should you so desire, take two seconds to inspect the next chicken you see at the store. It’s really not a lot of time, but with some practice you could get pretty good at it – which is a nice thought because you are essentially performing the task that stands between me eating a relatively clean chicken or a feces- and bile-covered chicken. (There is a difference, Mr. USDA, trust me on this one.)

Well, under this new program, the chicken companies will rubber stamp – er, I mean inspect 175 chickens a minute. 175! That’s just under three chickens a second.

Are you thinking, “Wait a minute, 175 chickens a minute? That’s impossible!” Well congratulations – you are now ahead of 100,000 USDA employees in the class on food safety.

I have a little test for you and the USDA: if you can even count to 175 in sixty seconds, I might reconsider my opposition.

If you can’t, you need to sign this petition, share it with the world, put it up on Facebook.

Even better, if you know anyone at the USDA, send it to them and ask them to see what they can do for you, for me, and for everyone who prefers their chickens to be properly inspected, let alone inspected at all.

_____

James Boyce has been involved in the progressive community online since his role as a Senior Advisor for John Kerry in 2004. Since then, he has been both a leading blogger, a frequent contributor to MSNBC, advisor to Bill Richardson in 2008, and founder of Common Sense NMS, an online strategy group with clients such as Stonyfield Farm, the Live Free or Die Alliance, HandPicked Nation, and more.

This post originally appeared at HandPicked Nation.

1 reply »

  1. And on the other hand, a small farm is not allowed to sell chickens to the public* because without USDA inspections those chickens can’t possibly be safe.

    At the farm i help out on, ten of us process 100-300 chickens in a pleasant Sunday that involves not everyone arriving and leaving at the same time, a relaxed lunch (without chicken on the menu), and plenty of beer and bullshit. I can inspect my chickens for contaminants mentioned in this post in two seconds, but i’ve also been “inspecting” as i go. The washer also inspects the chicken.

    Death involves blood, feces and bile. I understand that we’re well insulated from that by clinical lighting and grocery store packaging, but that doesn’t make it disappear.

    Of course the USDA is in bed with the meat and poultry producers, that’s why they issue blanket statements that the big producers produce safe meat without inspection and opposite statements that small producers cannot produce safe meat without USDA inspection.

    And while i understand that it is not a realistic option for most people, this issue is while i’ll stick to filling my freezer with meat and poultry from friends, trusted farmers, and/or that i help process. That shit in the grocery stores that the rest of you call meat is scary, from cradle to hygienically packaged shelves. And the USDA is a crock of shit.

    Do what you can, find a farmer, and get off the meat grid (chicken is the easiest). Don’t try to reform the USDA that’s almost futile. End run it.

    *Small farmers get around USDA regs in ways reminiscent of Homo sovieticus. It’s not public sale if the consumer “buys” a live chick from the farmer, who slaughters and process the animal and then gives it to the consumer so long as the farmer labels the bird “not for sale, not USDA inspected”. But it has to be a whole bird, even though parting the bird does not require gutting the chicken and is therefore less likely to release contaminants like blood and feces. (though i can see how industrial parting would hack the carcass badly and puncture the organ cavity)

Leave us a reply. All replies are moderated according to our Comment Policy (see "About S&R")

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s