Greatest. Journal. Ever. Jung's Red Book

Red-BookAn article in the Sunday New York Times magazine on September 16 entitled The Holy Grail of the Unconscious caught me by surprise. When young, I’d read Carl Jung, founder, along with Freud, of the school of analytical psychology. I was familiar with his ideas about archetypes and the collective unconscious. But who knew that one of his most seminal (finally, my big chance to use that, uh, seminal word) works had never been published?

But first, for those unfamiliar with Jung, the article’s author, Sara Corbett, informs us that he “regarded himself as a scientist [but] is today remembered more as a countercultural icon, a proponent of spirituality outside religion. … His central tenets — the existence of a collective unconscious and the power of archetypes — have seeped into the larger domain of New Age thinking while remaining more at the fringes of mainstream psychology.” Of course, then she goes on to chronicle the high regard in which he’s held by many psychologists and psychoanalysts, who practically worship him.

As for The Red Book, his family claimed it was unsure if Jung wanted it published. In fact, they sought to protect both his reputation and the family’s name because the book is personal to a fault — read: stark, raving bonkers. But that was the point.

Ms. Corbett explains the “mid-life crisis” that precipitated Jung keeping this journal.

What happened. . . to Carl Jung has. … been characterized variously as a creative illness, a descent into the underworld, a bout with insanity. … Whatever the case, in 1913, Jung, who was then 38 [became] haunted by troubling visions and heard inner voices. Grappling with the horror of some of what he saw, he worried in moments that he was. . . “menaced by a psychosis” . . .

Had he been a psychiatric patient, Jung might well have been. . . encouraged to ignore the circus going on in his head. But as a psychiatrist. … Jung worked to prevent his conscious mind from blocking out what his unconscious mind wanted to show him. [Emphasis added.]

Jung recorded … a curious, shifting dreamscape … in a regal, prophetic tone. … Writing in German, he filled 205 oversize pages with elaborate calligraphy and with richly hued, staggeringly detailed paintings.

I can attest to that after viewing The Red Book at the Rubin Museum of (Himalayan) Art in New York City, where it’s being shown along with supporting materials such as sketches and paintings. In addition a facsimile of The Red Book has just been published, with translation from the German and commentary.

What’s it look like in the flesh? Light years beyond just a journal, it’s really a latter-day illuminated manuscript. Strange, too, how pristine its condition is. The family, however unyielding, as Ms. Corbett portrays it, deserves credit for its conscientious custodianship.

But what’s The Red Book doing in a museum of Himalayan art? Mandalas. Lots of mandalas. From the museum’s website: “Jung was fascinated by the mandala — an artistic representation of the inner and outer cosmos used in Tibetan Buddhism to help practitioners reach enlightenment — and used mandala structures in a number of his own works.”

As you can imagine, The Red Book is ensconced in a kiosk of Plexiglas or similar material and is fixed open at one spread.

“They’ll turn the page in a few weeks,” an employee informed me.

Whoopee. I told her they should have positioned her inside the kiosk, where she could turn the pages for us. Still, it was dazzling.

Fortunately, the museum had a couple of copies of the book laying around for museum-goers to leaf through, which I did. Good thing, because between but a single spread of the real book visible and the $114 cost of the reproduction (probably cheap under the circumstances), viewing the latter was just as much of an opportunity as seeing the real book.

4 replies »

  1. Cool. What an experience to see the real thing!

    He was fascinated by the idea of mandalas as maps of the psyche, which has an interesting corollary with the Tibetan practice of creating incredible mandalas out of sand and then blowing them away as soon as they’re finished. To my mind, that corresponds quite well with the inner workings of the mind.

    Jung’s construction project probably fits nicely–in terms of analyzing him–with the Red Book. And i’ve always wondered if Jung was a mystic struggling to get out through his psychological work, or if his psychological work made him a mystic. I’m also disappointed that he never got to analyze the Gnostic Gospels fully.

  2. Russ, how cool! Thanks for sharing that with us today. The mandalas taken another way are the medicine wheels. These medicine wheels help us understand things we cannot see because they are ideas and not objects.

    Lex – I think he was a mystic first – his work with dreams as guides for your waking self makes me think he was plugged into something bigger first.

  3. I was always struck by how really ‘readable’ his works are.
    Another work of his that really influenced me was “Modern Man in search of a soul” . He was definitely of a Mystic sort .

  4. The skeptics claim that so-called
    psi phenomena can’t be proven.
    Here is the first –
    prime example of precognition
    through the dreaming function,
    with verification by senior
    researchers at Princeton University.
    It should be noted that Nostradamus
    mentions the Chaldean Alphabet, in
    a letter to Henry ll, in 1558.
    The star Kochab is long known
    in mythology, with references dating to 2467b.c.e. It, and
    a companion star are also called
    The Guardians of the Pole.
    Chaldean numerology was the system
    used in the events described above.

    Many scientists have commented on
    the nature of reality, including
    the Nobel laureate physicist,
    Professor W. Pauli, who concluded
    that “acausal events” -i.e.,
    “meaningful coincidencs” are part
    of our reality, and are the balance
    to cause and effect. Dr. Carl Jung
    used the term, “synchroncity principle.”

    “such is the nature of reality,
    that anyone can experience that
    which is least understood.” TDL