Health

Always look on the bright side of life

Some say that the glass is half-full.  Some are ruefull that it is half-empty.  The bitter truth remains: the stupid glass is twice as big as it needs to be.  Optimist.  Pessimist.  Pessimist who has embraced his pessimism.  But where do these outlooks originate?  If it’s a conscious decision, i.e. will power, then the pessimist may argue that the optimist is deluding himself; furthermore, the optimist can argue that the pessimist is ruining everything on purpose.  The high priests of pharmacology consider the issue to be one of brain chemistry, fixable with the elixirs of better living through chemistry.  It may well be further out of our hands that, at least if preliminary research published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B turns out to be correct.

Elaine Fox and colleagues from the University of Essex took DNA samples from 100 people before giving them the dot-probe paradigm test.  The test presents two images, one neutral and the other positive or negative.  A dot appears within one of the images, which the subject indicates with  a keypad.  Elapsed time between dot appearance and subject recognition is used to infer attraction to certain visual stimuli.  Optimists were more likely to recognize the dot in positive pictures.  They also took longer to recognize the dot in negative pictures.

“Eureka!” came when the team compared the dot-probe test results with the DNA test results.  The optimists all had two copies of the “long” variant of the 5-HTTLPR gene.  Test subjects with at least one short variant showed no bias towards the images, though previous research suggests that 5-HTTLPR shorties tend towards anxiety and negativity.  5-HTTLPR is a gene that controls the movement of everyone’s favorite neurotransmitter: serotonin.

Serotonin makes us happy, unless your brain re-uptakes the manufactured serotonin too quickly.  If that happens you’re depressed, and the answer to depression is something called a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor*, SSRI, or even “happy pill”.  Many of us take SSRI’s, enough to suggest that a large portion of the population is prone to anxiety and negativity.  The Fox study appears to support that assumption.  In order to be LL, a person would need to inherit the long version of 5-HTTLPR from both parents.  The long version, is then recessive like red-hair.  Furthermore, there would only be a one in four chance that a child who might be a genetic optimist will be one, unless both parents are genetic optimists.

The short story is that all the depressed pessimists out there can take heart: it’s not your fault.  The blame lies with your parents who didn’t have the good sense (in a Darwinian manner) to mate with the right sort of person.  You just got the short end of the gene, so to speak.  And the optimists can quit telling everyone to just ‘cheer up’ as if it will help, because it’s not really optimism speaking…just those long genes.

But the chances that the answer is nature or nurture is only as good as the chances of getting two long, optimism genes.  The study raises interesting questions and will certainly provoke further research.  That will be necessary to solidify findings from 100 people.  These findings, however, will be used in all manner of ways to justify silly arguments like genetic optimism and migration.  It’s already happening on comment threads related to the research.  The beauty of science is the same as the beauty of the Bible, you can use it to prove anything to anyone who doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

*The actual drug trials show that SSRI’s are no better than placebos, and the only evidence that serotonin controls depression is the efficacy of the SSRI’s.  We do know that the major hallucinogenics work on either serotonin levels or the receptor sites.  Clearly you may go through life lighter by taking 1/4 hit of LSD every morning, but that doesn’t make it a cure for depression.

Further reading:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16662-happiness-gene-helps-you-look-on-the-bright-side.html

http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13176767

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/feb/26/optimism-gene-destiny

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/feb/25/optimism-brightside-gene-mental-health

When this news landed in my inbox, the first thing that came into my mind was “Monty Python”.  To wit:

10 replies »

  1. http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/article5797028.ece?token=null&offset=24&page=3

    No 12

    Feeling fretful about glasses…

    “Whenever governments intervene in the market, in short, readers rush to buy Rand’s book. Why? The reason is explained by the name of a recently formed group on Facebook, the world’s biggest social-networking site: “Read the news today? It’s like ‘Atlas Shrugged’ is happening in real life”. The group, and an expanding chorus of fretful bloggers, reckon that life is imitating art.”

    http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13185404

    These guys helped out my genetic shortcomings…

  2. I wasn’t aware of the genetic study, but remember (and I don’t mean to be optimistic, just citing research) that work by Sonja Lyubomirsky and colleagues found that 50% of our happiness may be governed by genes, but 40% is under our voluntary control. We can teach ourselves how to be optimistic.

    This piece I wrote for Huffington offers seven strategies to start the process, especially during these difficult times.
    All best,
    Tamar Chansky
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tamar-chansky/how-to-practice-safe-opti_b_167443.html

  3. so how do splain one optimist daughter, and one pessimist daughter with the same 2 parents.
    stop blaiming me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  4. Half-empty, half-full… as long as it’s mine mine mine.

    I enjoyed the article by Dr. Chansky; whistling in the dark is almost a religion in our family.

  5. Why do they always leave out people like me, who see the glass as exactly what it is…???

    “The amount of the liquid in the container is half the container’s capacity.”

    I don’t make value judgments when observing containers of water.

  6. Konnie: if both parents are one long(x)/one short(X), then each child could end up as XX, Xx, xX, or xx. There’s a one in four chance to be any one. Only xx would make a person a genetic optimist, because X overpowers x.

    And the idea could turn out to be shite anyhow…or as Dr. Chansky said, it is probably a combination of nature and nurture.

  7. The ideal subjects would be twins separated at birth – and even then, since experience actually changes brain structure and chemistry, it wouldn’t be perfect.

  8. I wonder what other correlations can be made with optimism and human behavior. Any other links to studies would be appreciated.

    Sidebar: Although I remain steadfastly optimistic in life, I’m doing a trial study of decisions and the results. I’m using a magic 8 ball to make a specific set of decisions every day. So far, the magic 8 ball is working as good as regular decisions.

    Jeff

    Jeff

Leave us a reply. All replies are moderated according to our Comment Policy (see "About S&R")

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s