Alyssa Carducci of Media Trackers-Florida and The Heartland Institute revealed her ignorance of academia and climate issues and her hypocrisy regarding ethics when she misrepresented herself in order to obtain information on scientist Michael Mann’s speaking fees.
DC appeals court rejects attacks on EPA's greenhouse gas Endangerment Finding
The DC Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that the greenhouse gas Endangerment Finding was exactly what the EPA said it was – based on sound scientific evidence and anchored firmly within the legal requirements of the Clean Air Act.
Heartland Institute billboard continues a long pattern of dishonesty
The Heartland Institute’s recent Unabomber billboard and accompanying essay was filled with false allegations and errors, continuing Heartland’s long history of dishonesty.
Heartland Institute billboard continues a long pattern of hypocrisy (updated)
The Unabomber billboard continues a long and dark history of institutional hypocrisy by The Heartland Institute.
The ethos of The Heartland Institute: brazen hypocrisy
The Heartland Institute continues its brazen calls for others to be ethical while refusing to behave ethically itself.
Climate scientist defense group and Peter Gleick illustrate Heartland's irony and hypocrisy
The Heartland Institute’s recent statements are filled with irony and hypocrisy, a point made abundantly clear by an official letter from the Climate Scientist Legal Defense Fund and by the admission of responsibility by Peter Gleick.
Climate science discussion between Burt Rutan and Brian Angliss
S&R’s collection of a discussion on human-caused climate disruption between Brian Angliss, S&R climate/science writer and electrical engineer, and Burt Rutan, aerospace engineer and former CEO of Scaled Composites.
How much context is in the Climategate emails? (updated)
The illegally hacked and published CRU emails do not contain enough context to draw any firm conclusions about much of anything – real investigations, where complete records are examined and the principles are interviewed about meetings, phone conversations, and white-board conversations are required. And all such investigations have found that the so-called Climategate emails show no evidence of misconduct or conspiracy.
Zombie climate emails rise again (updated)
After two years of fermenting in the back of the fridge, the Climategate hacker pulled out a rank and moldy pile of leftover emails out just in time for the second anniversary of the original illegal CRU email release.
Heartland Institute's latest climate-related media advisory filled with the usual distortions
The Heartland Institute has a history of distorting climate science and lying about climate scientists. Their latest climate-related media advisory is no exception.
NSF clears Mann of misconduct implications made by Sen. Inhofe (updated)
National Science Foundation inspectors reject implications of misconduct made by Sen. Inhofe against Michael Mann.
NSF confirms results of Penn State investigation, exonerates Michael Mann of research misconduct
National Science Foundation inspectors concur with Penn State’s exoneration of Michael Mann on allegations of research misconduct.
Milloy proves he's either incompetent or a liar in latest op-ed
In his Washington Times op-ed titled 2012 GOP guide to the climate debate,” commentator Steve Milloy made a large number of claims that are demonstrably wrong – 18 at last count. But one of his claims relating to the illegal hack and release of climate scientists’ emails dubbed “Climategate” casts a shadow over all the […]






