CATEGORY: PoliticsReligion

The devil is in the details: WHICH Christianity are we making the official state religion, exactly?

CATEGORY: PoliticsReligionLegislators in North Carolina recently introduced a bill to make Christianity the official state religion. That bill has now been turfed, but we can probably expect similar moves in the future.

An Omnibus Poll, sponsored by YouGov.com and the Huffington Post, reveals just how far from the nation’s roots we have traveled on the subject of separating church and state and retaining the nation’s neutrality when it comes to how Americans chose to practice their respective religions.

According to the survey, 34 percent of Americans would favor making Christianity their official state religion while less than half (47 percent) oppose the concept. Thirty-two percent of those polled indicated that they would also favor a constitutional amendment that would make Christianity the official religion of the United States with just over half (52 percent) opposing the notion.

Leaving aside for a second the abject failure of millions of Americans to grasp the most basic precepts of their Constitution, this poll actually provides more questions than answers. Lots more. And in truth, these are questions with roots that are hundreds of years old.

If you’ve visited America anytime during the past couple of centuries, you realize that the nation has something of a church and state problem. You can argue the details all you like, but the bottom line is that the Framers of the Constitution set the stage for controversy by being too damned vague. I mean, “separation of Church and State” – what the hell does that really mean, anyway? We have these problems before us today because Jefferson, Madison and Co. didn’t have the basic good sense to insist on specificity, which is odd, given that all the Founding Fathers were pretty clearly fundamentalists. As, one assumes, were the Founding Mothers. They just toss terms like “God” and “Church” and “separation” around like we all know what they mean, when clearly we don’t.

So here’s what we have to do. Let’s forget separation of Church and State and accept that we are One Nation Under God, In God We damned sure Do Trust, and that we are a Christian Nation® (this part is crucial). Let’s get past all that soulless secular humanism and By God establish a state religion. Better yet, let’s charge Congress with the job, since so many of the members of that august body have thought long and hard on the subject already.

Here’s how it works. The U.S. will adopt as our national religion that which Congress can agree on sufficiently to pass by a two-thirds majority, and by this I mean they must pass each plank of the resolution by that margin. Understand, “God” is way too vague, and you can’t very well build a moral society around vagaries. We have to insist that Congress agree on what God is and how He (She) should be worshiped.

For instance, we’ll need Congress to decide whether the Bible is intended as a metaphorical guide or as literal, journalistic fact. Was Mary literally a virgin? Did Abraham literally live 900 years? Did Moses literally tie his ass to a tree and walk 40 miles? These are not small issues, and if they are not settled by legislative fiat we risk another millennium of sectarian strife.

Other issues we’ll need Congress to rule on:

  • Should baptism be by sprinkling as an infant or by immersion once one is born again? And, how quickly can we set in place an emergency re-baptism program for all those people that had it done wrong the first time?
  • Is God a man, a woman, both, or neither?
  • What race is God? This will be important when we do physical and artistic representations of Him/Her/It.
  • What about those places where the Bible appears to contradict itself, as in Genesis 1 & 2? Are we to take these as tests by God, or error by monks, or what? Confusion in one’s prime legal texts can lead to all sorts of mischief, as I think is more than evident from the fact that we’re even having this little chat to start with.
  • We’ll need a plan to transfer power from the President to Jesus when He makes his triumphant return to Earth after the Rapture.
  • We’ll also need a policy of engagement for Armageddon. When do we launch the nukes, and at whom? Once we know who’s on God’s side and who’s on the side of Satan, shouldn’t we just go ahead and launch a pre-emptive strike?
  • How old is that darned Earth, anyway? I mean, it’s important to know what to tell kids about dinosaurs if the world is only 6000 years old.
  • What the hell do we do about those damned Jews, who have made clear that they aren’t on board with Jesus as the Son of God? Do we wait and let Jesus deal with them himself or should we set about making them either believe what we believe or leave?
  • And don’t even get me started on Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Mormons, and other varieties of Satanist. If we’re truly a Christian land, is it right that their blasphemy should be tolerated, and worse, that they should be able to benefit from social programs paid for by Right-thinking Christians?
  • Should the Office of Homeland Godliness be a Cabinet-level appointment reporting to the President? Should the President be the de jure head of the Church? Should it be a separate branch of government insulated from the meddling influence of future secular legislators, and especially from Satanic minions on the Supreme Court? Or, for that matter, should we rework the government and Constitution so that we replace the democracy with a Christian theocracy?
  • What should our foreign policy toward non-Christian nations be like? Some of them are Godless, but strategically important (Britain, Canada, anybody with oil, etc.) Should a nation’s relationship with God be a consideration in conferring most-favored-nation status?
  • There’s also the woman problem. Are they to be submissive to their husbands, as dictated by some, or are they to be accepted as full partners in God’s Church of America? Can they be ministers, for example? And while we’re on the subject of troublesome sorts, is the Church going to take the “accepting” stance toward gays or are they all going to hell? If the latter, should we get them on their way or let God deal with them in His own good time?
  • Finally, what about the athletics programs? Back in the ’80s in Wilmington, NC, there was a huge hullaballoo over – of all things – softball. The local Mormon church signed up for the city-run league, causing the other churches to pitch a galloping hissy fit. Said one spokesman, “we do not feel we can extend the hand of Christian fellowship to people who do not worship the same god we do.” The Mormons stood their ground, those who worshiped a different god from the Mormons stood theirs, and the city was forced to cancel the whole damned league. But that was over 20 years ago – we’re past all that now, right? Nuh-uh. The same kind of conflict broke out again last year in Pennsylvania.

Give me another hour or two and I’ll come up with more questions, but you get the idea. The success of a faith-based government hinges on getting these issues settled and chiseled into stone sooner rather than later. If Congress leaves wiggle room and unanswered questions we’ll be at each other’s throats until the Second Coming, and I’m pretty sure that’s not what the Framers intended.

_____

An earlier iteration of this post originally appeared on January 20, 2010.

21 comments on “The devil is in the details: WHICH Christianity are we making the official state religion, exactly?

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention Scholars and Rogues » A Modest Proposal: How to Really Solve the Church/State Mess -- Topsy.com

  2. Love it!!!! They’ll be fighting over these points until the end of time. In the meantime, we won’t have to worry about anyone imposing any State religion as they’ll be too busy arguing!

  3. Pingback: Far Right makes no secret of their aggressive goals. « Southwest Progressive

  4. Pingback: When Jesus Attacks! Why don’t we care that the Catholic Church is officially whipping Congress? « Lullaby Pit

  5. Pingback: Tim Tebow and the problem with "faith" | Scholars and Rogues

  6. Pingback: When Jesus Attacks! Why don’t we care that the Catholic Church is officially whipping Congress? | Scholars and Rogues

  7. Pingback: The devil is in the details: WHICH Christianity are we making the official state religion, exactly? - The Agonist

  8. Pingback: The Next Nicea

  9. Pingback: WHY CHURCH-STATE SEPARATION IS GOOD FOR EVERYONE | In Phase News

  10. ” Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Mormons, and other varieties of Satanist.”

    Muslims and Mormons consider themselves Christian. Muslims are traditionally considered Christians lead astray by a schism in Catholicism as well (Just like Lutherans, Baptists and other offshoots of the one true church).

  11. Rastafarianism. It’s Christianity with pot, Caribbean music, a positive disposition towards minorities, and not much in the way of dogma. It’s a win-win.

  12. The Constitution does not say anything about “Separation of Church and State.” It forbids an establishment of religion and interference with free practice. A prayer before school or a creche on the courthouse lawn does not constitute an “establishment of religion,” nor do they interfere with anyone’s free exercise. SCOTUS simply needs to admit it screwed up.

    • At no point did the author attribute that phrase to the Constitution itself. It appears, however, in numerous documents vital to the formation of and understanding of the Constitution. The most important historical use by a Founding Father is in Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptist Association in 1802, but the term itself first appeared in the writings of Lucretius and Epicureus, which along with the work of St. Augustine, followed by the Reformation and the Enlightenment, further led to the current form of the concept.

      And just because it’s not presently in the Constitution doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be. So far, every time it’s been tried, a state religion has led to injustice and suffering.

    • Glad you agree. I and others will now move to ban all work on the real Sabbath [sundown Friday to sundown Saturday], that sale of food products containing pork and mixing meat with milk as well as all fabrics of mixed fiber. The law will also be changed to forbid divorce, interracial or interreligious marriages and men can have as many wives as they wish.

  13. They would also have to decide which bible to read. KJV, NIV,Moffatt, Reina, etc. It would help decide things like Mary being a “Virgin” or a “Maiden”.

  14. Pingback: Which Christianity Should We Establish? » Dispatches from the Culture Wars

Leave us a reply. All replies are moderated according to our Comment Policy (see "About S&R")

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s